I agree. Then, with the left side of the pages as they scroll to show more, you can see what's good and what's bad. But when the top ends with no positive comment, there is a reference to an idea that never should be placed there. After the revised section of the voting, there could be topical lists of isolated categories with amounts paid off. Furthermore, capital average of the invested polarity, never seems to announce ideas with chosen influence. If Quirky would only reconsider the actual meta trilogy of the compiled synopsis, the whole side of the web with infinite construction would lead to possible active nebula's in various forums. So, I totally see where you're coming from.

I understand your attempt to let me know that my suggestion is somewhat confusing, but I was not suggesting that we make the voting and comment process any more complicated. Just an idea to put more ideas on the screen for viewing at once so we could quickly scan them and decide which ones we'd like to have a look at...

The easy way to handle this is to vote or comment or save ideas. Then you can later filter those ideas and view those ideas only. Try it. It works.

Once again, I understand how the process works (I promise, I really do...)I'm not recommending any changes to the existing system...Merely an addition that might make it more convenient for us to review more good ideas in less time.