It is interesting how many more comments there are this time around.
As before, I do like the concept, but I still would like more details about how it would work, dimensions, etc.. The Obag example shows that the concept isn't new, even though it hasn't been produced, but I do agree that it could be neat if it fit the traveler's needs.
Alexandria's point about rolling over nasty stuff is a good one -- you definitely don't want that stuff all over your suitcase if the suitcase is the ball that contacts the ground.I do like Tina Sneed's take on it -- use a ball for maneuverability, and have a Quirky sort of bag that it rolls on.
Other considerations are carry-on capability (i.e., size constraints) not to mention durability if used as a checked bag.
This idea makes me think of the dyson ball in those vacuum cleaner commercials. It might solve some of the problems that have been posed if you use the ball like the vacuum guy just for maneuverability and had it attach to a larger ball that would actually be the case. It would still look like the picture just that the big ball wouldnt roll, the small one inset into the large one would. It sounds wierd but its basically a ball shaped bag rolling on a ball instead of a bag that is a ball so you dont have to touch all the gross stuff you roll over.
I think the Obag is like the red item in the original post picture. This picture shows the wasted space in the middle of that design: http://tinyurl.com/y4pqaef
What this could be is a hollow tube, open all the way through, only capped on the ends, with wheels around the outside, and it should have the capability of carrying luggage strapped to the top. That would be much different than the Obag.
Was Yanko's Obag concept similar to what this design idea was? Because if so, I'm sure there's a number of patents out on it. What I was picturing wasn't like 'a rolling composter' or 'cement mixer'.
@Alexandria, Fenders could be added if desired, to cover part of the tires. But, you would just need to balance coverage to make sure tires still touch the curb first and so they don't get in the way when standing the 'dolly' with the handle up.
@Alexandria, Fenders could be added if desired, to cover part of the tires. But, you would just need to balance coverage to make sure tires still touch the curb first and so they don't get in the way when standing the 'dolly' with the handle up.
This obag makes a few negative trade offs. The handle cuts into storage space in the middle and there is no way to carry other stuff on top.
Implementation could be relatively inexpensive. In its simplest form, think large PVC pipe and screw on end caps. Each tire is one piece molded hard rubber shaped in a U with gap inward. Inside that mount for (1/4 circle) plastic arcs with two or three small roller bearings mounted to them. The gap of the tire rides on the roller bearings. After inserting four of these 1/4 circle plastic mounts into the tire, slip over the tube and attache with countersunk screws from the inside. Another plastic fitting with the air hose type handle connector would mount between the tires. If we wanted to add stabilizer legs (similar to bicycle kickstand) to keep it stable while loading, these could mount on the sides between the wheels. Once at your destination, slip out the duffle bag to access your items. Overall, it seems fairly simple.
I think the best use of this is when you have more than one bag. This would provide one bag with large wheels on which to carry the other(s). In the configuration I drew, it is basically a dolly for carrying luggage which can also contain luggage itself. In that way, width is greater than diameter, just like the duffle bag it would contain.
Alas, The market is already saturated with lugguage bags, I think that what would stand out with your product would be, cost. Cus you already got that special wheel mechanisms that move the lugguage as well as charge the devices...Special points bout it but I'd rather stick to the regular lugguages if this product is expensive.
Comments
It is interesting how many more comments there are this time around.
As before, I do like the concept, but I still would like more details about how it would work, dimensions, etc.. The Obag example shows that the concept isn't new, even though it hasn't been produced, but I do agree that it could be neat if it fit the traveler's needs.
Alexandria's point about rolling over nasty stuff is a good one -- you definitely don't want that stuff all over your suitcase if the suitcase is the ball that contacts the ground.I do like Tina Sneed's take on it -- use a ball for maneuverability, and have a Quirky sort of bag that it rolls on.
Other considerations are carry-on capability (i.e., size constraints) not to mention durability if used as a checked bag.
Nice improvements on a basic concept, Quirksters!
This idea makes me think of the dyson ball in those vacuum cleaner commercials. It might solve some of the problems that have been posed if you use the ball like the vacuum guy just for maneuverability and had it attach to a larger ball that would actually be the case. It would still look like the picture just that the big ball wouldnt roll, the small one inset into the large one would. It sounds wierd but its basically a ball shaped bag rolling on a ball instead of a bag that is a ball so you dont have to touch all the gross stuff you roll over.
way to be persistent. you got my vote
I like the idea i just think it needs some design work, but the idea is great, and i think the community could come up with some creative desighns
I think the Obag is like the red item in the original post picture. This picture shows the wasted space in the middle of that design: http://tinyurl.com/y4pqaef
What this could be is a hollow tube, open all the way through, only capped on the ends, with wheels around the outside, and it should have the capability of carrying luggage strapped to the top. That would be much different than the Obag.
Was Yanko's Obag concept similar to what this design idea was? Because if so, I'm sure there's a number of patents out on it. What I was picturing wasn't like 'a rolling composter' or 'cement mixer'.
@Alexandria, Fenders could be added if desired, to cover part of the tires. But, you would just need to balance coverage to make sure tires still touch the curb first and so they don't get in the way when standing the 'dolly' with the handle up.
@Alexandria, Fenders could be added if desired, to cover part of the tires. But, you would just need to balance coverage to make sure tires still touch the curb first and so they don't get in the way when standing the 'dolly' with the handle up.
This obag makes a few negative trade offs. The handle cuts into storage space in the middle and there is no way to carry other stuff on top.
Implementation could be relatively inexpensive. In its simplest form, think large PVC pipe and screw on end caps. Each tire is one piece molded hard rubber shaped in a U with gap inward. Inside that mount for (1/4 circle) plastic arcs with two or three small roller bearings mounted to them. The gap of the tire rides on the roller bearings. After inserting four of these 1/4 circle plastic mounts into the tire, slip over the tube and attache with countersunk screws from the inside. Another plastic fitting with the air hose type handle connector would mount between the tires. If we wanted to add stabilizer legs (similar to bicycle kickstand) to keep it stable while loading, these could mount on the sides between the wheels. Once at your destination, slip out the duffle bag to access your items. Overall, it seems fairly simple.
I think the best use of this is when you have more than one bag. This would provide one bag with large wheels on which to carry the other(s). In the configuration I drew, it is basically a dolly for carrying luggage which can also contain luggage itself. In that way, width is greater than diameter, just like the duffle bag it would contain.
My bad there for saying it was out in stores.
Alas, The market is already saturated with lugguage bags, I think that what would stand out with your product would be, cost. Cus you already got that special wheel mechanisms that move the lugguage as well as charge the devices...Special points bout it but I'd rather stick to the regular lugguages if this product is expensive.
Viewing: 1-10 of 40
Show All